David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Conway and Kochen have presented a “free will theorem” [4, 6] which they claim shows that “if indeed we humans have free will, then [so do] elementary particles.” In a more precise fashion, they claim it shows that for certain quantum experiments in which the experimenters can choose between several options, no deterministic or stochastic model can account for the observed outcomes without violating a condition “MIN” motivated by relativistic symmetry. We point out that for stochastic models this conclusion is not correct, while for deterministic models it is not new. In the way the free will theorem is formulated and proved, it only concerns deterministic models. But Conway and Kochen have argued [4, 5, 6, 7] that “randomness can’t help,” meaning that stochastic models are excluded as well if we insist on the conditions “SPIN”, “TWIN”, and “MIN”. We point out a mistake in their argument. Namely, the theorem is of the form deterministic model with SPIN & TWIN & MIN ⇒ contradiction , (1) and in order to derive the further claim, which is of the form stochastic model with SPIN & TWIN & MIN ⇒ contradiction , (2) Conway and Kochen propose a method for converting any stochastic model into a deterministic one .
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Federico Laudisa (2014). Against the 'No-Go' Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):1-17.
Similar books and articles
Tomasz Placek, On Propensity-Frequentist Models for Stochastic Phenomena; with Applications to Bell's Theorem.
Tomasz Placek (2000). Stochastic Outcomes in Branching Space-Time: Analysis of Bell's Theorem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):445-475.
John T. Baldwin (1990). The Spectrum of Resplendency. Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (2):626-636.
Carl Mummert & Stephen G. Simpson (2004). An Incompleteness Theorem for [Image]. Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):612 - 616.
John T. Baldwin (1989). Diverse Classes. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):875-893.
J. Reddingius, S. A. Vries & A. J. Stam (1982). On a Stochastic Version of a Modified Nicholson-Baily Model. Acta Biotheoretica 31 (2).
Jeremy Butterfield (1992). Bell's Theorem: What It Takes. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):41-83.
Added to index2009-06-12
Total downloads76 ( #55,323 of 1,796,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #98,157 of 1,796,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?