David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Freud Wars offers a comprehensive introduction to the crucial question of the justification of psychoanalysis. Part I examines three powerful critiques of psychoanalysis in the context of a recent controversy about its nature and legitimacy: is it a bankrupt science, an innovative science, or not a science at all but a system of interpretation? The discussion makes sense of the entrenched disagreement about the validity of psychoanalysis, and demonstrates how the disagreement is rooted in the theoretical ambiguity of the central concept of psychoanalysis, the unconscious. This ambiguity is then presented as the pathway to a new way of understanding psychoanalysis, based on a mode of thinking that precedes division into mental and physical. The reader is drawn into a lively and thought-provoking analysis of the central issues: · What would it mean for psychoanalysis to count as a science? · Is psychoanalysis a form of hermeneutics? · How can mental and physical explanations coincide? Part II contains the source material for Part I: the influential critiques of psychoanalysis by Adolf Grünbaum, Thomas Nagel and Jürgen Habermas. No specialised knowledge is assumed, and the book is clear and accessible while still conveying the complexity and richness of the subject. It provides a fascinating introduction to philosophical thinking on psychoanalysis for students and practitioners of psychoanalysis, psychotherapy and philosophy.
|Keywords||Psychoanalysis Philosophy Psychoanalysis Psychoanalytic Theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$32.10 new (22% off) $34.60 direct from Amazon (16% off) $36.66 used (11% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BF175.G649 2005|
|ISBN(s)||9781583917107 158391711X 1583917101 9781583917114|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul J. Quirk (2008). Putting Experts in Their Place. Critical Review 20 (3):333-357.
Similar books and articles
Julia Borossa & Ivan Ward (eds.) (2009). Psychoanalysis, Fascism, and Fundamentalism. Edinburgh University Press.
Louise Gyler (2010). The Gendered Unconscious: Can Gender Discourses Subvert Psychoanalysis? Routledge.
Robert C. Richardson (1990). The "Tally Argument" and the Validation of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):668-676.
André Haynal (1993). Psychoanalysis and the Sciences: Epistemology--History. University of California Press.
Louise Braddock & Michael Lacewing (eds.) (2007). The Academic Face of Psychoanalysis: Papers in Philosophy, the Humanities, and the British Clinical Tradition. Routledge.
Roland Peterson & Sybe Terwee (1994). Can Functionalism Provide the Proper Basis for a Core Theory of Psychoanalysis? Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):463-469.
William Joseph Massicotte (1994). A Philosophical Examination of Recent Clinical and Theoretical Psychoanalysis. Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #111,786 of 1,902,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #346,051 of 1,902,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?