David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 15 (3):251-267 (2009)
Traditionally, liberals have confined religion to the sphere of the ‘private’ or ‘non-political’. However, recent debates over the place of religious symbols in public spaces, state financing of faith schools, and tax relief for religious organisations suggest that this distinction is not particularly useful in easing the tension between liberal commitments to equality on the one hand, and freedom of religion on the other. This article deals with one aspect of this debate, which concerns whether members of religious communities should receive exemptions from regulations that place a distinctively heavy burden on them. Drawing on Habermas’ understanding of churches as ‘communities of interpretation’, we explore possible alternatives to both the ‘rule-and-exemption’ approach and the ‘neutralist’ approach. Our proposal rests on the idea of mutual learning between secular and religious perspectives. On this interpretation, what is required is (i) the generation and maintenance of public spaces in which there could be discussion and dialogue about particular cases, and (ii) evaluation of whether the basic conditions of moral discourse are present in these spaces. Thus deliberation becomes a touchstone for the building of a shared democratic ethos.
|Keywords||Neutrality Religious beliefs Religious exemption Deliberative democracy Discourse ethics Public sphere|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Audi (1997). Religion in the Public Square. Rowman & Littlefield.
Robert Audi (1989). The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (3):259-296.
Veit Bader (2003). Religious Diversity and Democratic Institutional Pluralism. Political Theory 31 (2):265-294.
Veit Bader (1999). Religious Pluralism: Secularism or Priority for Democracy? Political Theory 27 (5):597-633.
Veit Bader (2003). Taking Religious Pluralism Seriously. Arguing for an Institutional Turn. Introduction. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):3-22.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Caleb Clanton (2008). Religion in the Public Square? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):82-93.
James Bohman (2003). Deliberative Toleration. Political Theory 31 (6):757-779.
Warren G. Frisina (2011). Religion and the Ritual of Public Discourse1. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (1):74 - 92.
Hava Tirosh-Samuelson (2010). History and the Future of Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (2):448-461.
Mathias Thaler (2009). From Public Reason to Reasonable Accommodation: Negotiating the Place of Religion in the Public Sphere. Diacrítica. Revista Do Centro de Estudos Humanísticos da Universidade de Minho 23 (2):249-270.
Noëlle McAfee (2008). Democracy and the Political Unconscious. Columbia University Press.
Edmund F. Byrne (2010). Why and How Secular Society Should Accommodate Religion: A Philosophical Proposal. Edwin Mellen Press.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Added to index2009-08-29
Total downloads35 ( #69,644 of 1,696,570 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #47,596 of 1,696,570 )
How can I increase my downloads?