David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3):361-389 (2002)
361DIALECTIC AS ?PHILOSOPHICAL EMBARRASSMENT? * Francisco Gonzalez is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Skidmore College. Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 40, no. 3 361?89  Dialectic as ?Philosophical Embarrassment?: Heidegger?s Critique of Plato?s Method FRANCISCO GONZALEZ* Philosophie ist ein Ringen um die Methode. Hans-Georg Gadamer has expressed the following debt to the thought of Martin Heidegger: ?The philosophical stimuli I received from Heidegger led me more and more into the realm of dialectic, Plato?s as well as Hegel?s.?1 It is therefore surprising to discover that Heidegger himself did not see his thought as leading him into the realm of dialectic. On the contrary, in Being and Time we find a curt and unexplained dismissal of dialectic, specifically Plato?s, as a ?genuine philosophical embarrassment? .2 This dismissal is repeated in the Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics course of WS 1929/30 where Heidegger asserts that ?all dialectic in philosophy,? and thus that of Hegel as well as Plato, ?is only the expression of an embarrassment.?3 Only with the publication of Heidegger?s earlier lecture courses from the 1920s, are we in a position to understand and evaluate this surprising dismissal. We are also in a better position to understand why even the later Heidegger failed to reassess his rejection of dialectic, despite the existence of strong incentives for doing so: incentives recognized not only by..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Joseph S. O'Leary (2014). Everyday Life and Ultimate Reality: Dialectical Reversals in Hegel, Heidegger and Buddhism. Contemporary Buddhism 15 (2):465-478.
Similar books and articles
J. Tate (1940). Plato's Dialectic Julius Stenzel: Plato's Method of Dialectic. Translated and Edited by D.J. Allan. Pp. Xliii+170. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940. Cloth, 10s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (03):143-144.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2009). Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue. Pennsylvania State University Press.
H. H. Benson (2012). The Problem is Not Mathematics, but Mathematicians: Plato and the Mathematicians Again. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):170-199.
Julius Stenzel (1940). Plato's Method of Dialectic. New York,Arno Press.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2008). And the Rest is Sigetik: Silencing Logic and Dialectic in Heidegger's Beiträge Zur Philosophie. Research in Phenomenology 38 (3):358-391.
David Evans (2007). Dialogue and Dialectic. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:61-65.
Francisco J. González (1998). Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato's Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Northwestern University Press.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (1997). On the Way to Sophia: Heidegger on Plato's Dialectic, Ethics, and Sophist. Research in Phenomenology 27 (1):16-60.
Richard Robinson (1953). Plato's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford University Press.
Søren Overgaard (2003). Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #115,657 of 1,907,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #274,312 of 1,907,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?