David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):205-217 (2013)
The initial stage for the discussion is the distinction between bona fide and fiat objects drawn by Barry Smith and collaborators in the context of formal ontology. This paper aims at both producing a rationale for introducing a hitherto unrecognized kind of object—here called ‘Interactive Fiat Objects’ (IFOs)—into the ontology of objects, and casting light on the relationship between embodied cognition and interactive ontology with the aid of the concepts of affordance and ad hoc category. I conclude that IFOs are similar to fiat objects, affordances and ad hoc categories in a number of ways, yet they differ from these in important respects. Interaction is key to understanding the existence and peculiarities of IFOs. By adopting an embodied perspective on cognition, we can enrich our ontological typologies and highlight relevant features of our physical and symbolic environment that are otherwise overlooked. This should improve our understanding of object ontology and persuade us to include IFOs in our metaphysical inventories
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James J. Gibson (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson & Eleanor Rosch (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.
Alva Noë (2005). Action in Perception. The MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2007). Hacking on the Looping Effects of Psychiatric Classifications: What is an Interactive and Indifferent Kind? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):329 – 344.
K. Shutts, L. Markson, E. S. Spelke, B. Hood & L. Santos (2009). The Developmental Origins of Animal and Artifact Concepts. In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie Santos (eds.), The Origins of Object Knowledge. Oxford University Press
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2010). Interactive Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):335-360.
Matt L. Drabek (2010). Interactive Classification and Practice in the Social Sciences. Poroi 6 (2):62-80.
Barry Smith (2001). Fiat Objects. Topoi 20 (2):131-148.
James Franklin (1980). More on Part IX of Hume's Dialogues. Philosophical Quarterly 30 (118):69-71.
Barry Smith (1995). On Drawing Lines on a Map. Spatial Information Theory:475–484.
Alex Levine (2011). Epistemic Objects as Interactive Loci. Axiomathes 21 (1):57-66.
Herbert Kalthoff & Tobias Roehl (2011). Interobjectivity and Interactivity: Material Objects and Discourse in Class. [REVIEW] Human Studies 34 (4):451-469.
Ingvar Johansson (2007). Continua in Biological Systems. The Monist 90 (4):499-522.
Kersten Reich (2007). Interactive Constructivism in Education. Education and Culture 23 (1):7-26.
John Dilworth (2010). Realistic Virtual Reality and Perception. Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):23-42.
Margareth Sandvik (1997). Reconstructing Interactive Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation 11 (4):419-434.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde (2001). Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: “Category-Specific” Neuropsychological Deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476.
Mark H. Bickhard (2001). Function, Anticipation, Representation. AIP Conference Proceedings 573:459-469.
Added to index2012-12-04
Total downloads395 ( #3,568 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)124 ( #2,098 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?