David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in East European Thought 59 (4):309 - 346 (2007)
Despite all that has been written about Russian historiography and how it profoundly changed after the Bolsheviks seized power in 1917, very little is known about the historical tradition immediately before the Soviet era. This article attempts to begin to address this issue by examining the major forces that shaped the historical and sociological thought of Nikolai Alesandrovich Rozhkov (1868–1927). It argues that as Kliuchevskii’s successor and as the first professional historian to eventually present a Marxist analysis of Russian history, Rozhkov was not only the most important historian at that time but one whose work best represented the most significant transition in Russia’s historical tradition. The article concludes that an examination of Rozhkov’s historical methodology offers a new interpretation of the origins of Soviet historiography.
|Keywords||Russian historiography Kliuchevskii History Tradition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
R. G. Collingwood (1993). The Idea of History. Oxford University Press.
Albrecht Wellmer (2003). Critical Theory of Society*(1969). In Gerard Delanty & Piet Strydom (eds.), Philosophies of Social Science: The Classic and Contemporary Readings. Open University 259.
S. R. Seliga, V. V. Zenkovsky & George L. Kline (1955). A History of Russian Philosophy. Philosophical Quarterly 5 (21):375.
P. M. Heimann & Frederick Gregory (1978). Scientific Materialism in Nineteenth Century Germany. Philosophical Quarterly 28 (112):272.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Assen Ignatow (1984). Das Geschichtliche in Marxistischer Sicht. Studies in East European Thought 27 (2):147-173.
Leonard Mendes Marsak (ed.) (1977). The Nature of Historical Inquiry. R. E. Krieger Publishing Company.
Gregory Blue (1998). Joseph Needham, Heterodox Marxism and the Social Background to Chinese Science. Science and Society 62 (2):195 - 217.
T. Rockmore (2009). Remarks on Russian Philosophy, Soviet Philosophy, and Historicism. Diogenes 56 (2-3):84-94.
Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, Achim Mittag & Jörn Rüsen (eds.) (2005). Historical Truth, Historical Criticism, and Ideology: Chinese Historiography and Historical Culture From a New Comparative Perspective. Brill.
Laird Addis (1968). Historicism and Historical Laws of Development. Inquiry 11 (1-4):155 – 174.
Jean Porter (1997). Mere History: The Place of Historical Studies in Theological Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):103 - 126.
Alix Cohen (2005). In Defence of Hume's Historical Method. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (3):489 – 502.
Dmitri Nikulin (2008). Memory and History. Idealistic Studies 38 (1/2):75-90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #363,867 of 1,907,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,362 of 1,907,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?