Neither bad apple nor bad barrel: how the societal context impacts unethical behavior in organizations
Business Ethics 21 (1):31-46 (2012)
|Abstract||Every time another corporate scandal captures media headlines, the ‘bad apple vs. bad barrel’ discussion starts anew. Yet this debate overlooks the influence of the broader societal context on organizational behavior. In this article, we argue that misbehaviors of organizations (the ‘barrels’) and their members (the ‘apples’) cannot be addressed properly without a clear understanding of their broader context (the ‘larder’). Whereas previously, a strong societal framework dampened the practical application of the Homo economicus concept (business actors as perfectly rational and egocentric utility-maximizing agents without any moral concern), specialization, individualization and globalization led to a business world disembedded from broader societal norms. This emancipated business world promotes a literal interpretation of Homo economicus among business organizations and their members. Consequently, we argue that the first step toward ‘healthier’ apples and barrels is to sanitize the larder, that is, adapt the framework in which organizations and their members evolve|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marshall Schminke (1991). Ethics in Declining Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (3):235-248.
Donald L. McCabe (1998). The Ethical Context in Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):447-476.
Mark John Somers (2001). Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the Relationship Between Codes of Conduct, Employee Behavior and Organizational Values. Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):185 - 195.
Josep F. Mària & Daniel Arenas (2009). Societal Ethos and Economic Development Organizations in Nicaragua. Journal of Business Ethics 88:231 - 244.
Manuel Velasqusez (1996). Why Ethics Matters. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):201-222.
Linda K. Treviño (2006). Bad Apples In Bad Barrels Revisited. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):449-473.
David Souder (2004). Bad Apples or Bad Bushel? Business and Professional Ethics Journal 23 (1/2):201-222.
Dennis Duchon & Brian Drake (2009). Organizational Narcissism and Virtuous Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):301 - 308.
Melanie R. Roberts (2011). Realizing Societal Benefit From Academic Research: Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion. Social Epistemology 23 (3):199-219.
Neal M. Ashkanasy, Carolyn A. Windsor & Linda K. Treviño (2006). Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):449-474.
Ali A. Al-Kazemi & Gary Zajac (1999). Ethics Sensitivity and Awareness Within Organizations in Kuwait: An Empirical Exploration of Epoused Theory and Theory-in-Use. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (4):353 - 361.
Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman (2002). Ethics Codes and Professionals' Tolerance of Societal Diversity. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (4):301 - 312.
Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):71 - 88.
L. L. Jayaraman & Byung K. Min (1993). Business Ethics — a Developmental Perspective: The Evolution of the Free and Mature Corporation. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (9):665 - 675.
Ronald R. Sims (1992). Linking Groupthink to Unethical Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (9):651 - 662.
Added to index2011-12-13
Total downloads7 ( #133,587 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?