David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 18 (2):167-184 (2008)
In defending the teaching of emptiness, Bh?vaviveka offers some very strange arguments, which initially may appear so weak that we may be hard pressed to understand how anyone could endorse them. To make sense of these passages, it is helpful to compare them to an argument found in the writings of the Naiy?yika Uddyotakara. These arguments have a certain formal feature which makes them count as valid from the point of view of the rules and norms of some forms of Indian logic. Once we understand the logical structure of the arguments offered by Uddyotakara and Bh?vaviveka, we will not only have a better grasp on their philosophical views, but we will also be in a better position to understand how and why those views were rejected by later figures in the Indian tradition, such as Dharmak?rti and ??ntarak?ita
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Georges B. J. Dreyfus (1997). Recognizing Reality Dharmakirti's Philosophy and its Tibetan Interpretations. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Dan Arnold (2005). Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief: Epistemology in South Asian Philosophy of Religion. Columbia University Press.
Bimal Krishna Matilal, Jonardon Ganeri & Heeraman Tiwari (1998). The Character of Logic in India. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Tom J. F. Tillemans (1999). Scripture, Logic, Language Essays on Dharmakirti and His Tibetan Successors.
By Charles Goodman (2004). The Treasury of Metaphysics and the Physical World. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):389–401.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mario Gómez-Torrente (2000). A Note on Formality and Logical Consequence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (5):529-539.
Dan Arnold (2008). Dharmakīrti's Dualism: Critical Reflections on a Buddhist Proof of Rebirth. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1079-1096.
Charles Goodman (2008). Bhvaviveka's Arguments for Emptiness. Asian Philosophy 18 (2):167 – 184.
Paul J. Griffiths (1999). What Do Buddhists Hope For From Antitheistic Argument? Faith and Philosophy 16 (4):506-522.
Douglas S. Duckworth (2010). De/Limiting Emptiness and the Boundaries of the Ineffable. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (1):97-105.
Newman Robert Glass (1995). Working Emptiness: Toward a Third Reading of Emptiness in Buddhism and Postmodern Thought. Scholars Press.
Malcolm David Eckel (1994). To See the Buddha: A Philosopher's Quest for the Meaning of Emptiness. Princeton University Press.
Abraham Vélez de Cea (2005). Emptiness in the Pāli. Philosophy East and West 55 (4).
Hendrik Hart (1987). Kai Nielsen's Philosophy & Atheism. Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):334-346.
Donald S. Lopez (1988). Do Śrāvakas Understand Emptiness? Journal of Indian Philosophy 16 (1):65-105.
Added to index2010-07-12
Total downloads18 ( #203,519 of 1,796,321 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #467,624 of 1,796,321 )
How can I increase my downloads?