Graduate studies at Western
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):233-237 (2008)
|Abstract||Kai Spiekermann shows how groups of people cooperating purely for mutual advantage could solve social dilemmas by `assortation', deftly including and excluding people from the group of people who are cooperating among themselves. This article explores the normative implications of that result, casting further doubt on normative models treating justice as a `club good'. Key Words: justice club non-ideal theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Keith M. Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, Carole Pateman & Brian Barry (eds.) (2004). Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press.
Kai Spiekermann (2008). Reply: Clubbish Justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):447-453.
J. Salter (2012). Hume and Mutual Advantage. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):302-321.
P. Vanderschraaf (2011). Justice as Mutual Advantage and the Vulnerable. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):119-147.
John Kekes (2006). Justice: A Conservative View. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):88-108.
Xianzhong Huang (2007). Justice as a Virtue: An Analysis of Aristotle's Virtue of Justice. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):265-279.
James P. Sterba (1988). How to Make People Just: A Practical Reconciliation of Alternative Conceptions of Justice. Rowman & Littlefield.
David Schmidtz (2006). Elements of Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Wojciech Sadurski (1984). Social Justice and Legal Justice. Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
Kai Spiekermann (2007). Translucency, Assortation, and Information Pooling: How Groups Solve Social Dilemmas. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):285-306.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #55,684 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?