David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 172 (3):361 - 379 (2010)
According to Alberto Coffa in The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Kant’s account of mathematical judgment is built on a ‘semantic swamp’. Kant’s primitive semantics led him to appeal to pure intuition in an attempt to explain mathematical necessity. The appeal to pure intuition was, on Coffa’s line, a blunder from which philosophy was forced to spend the next 150 years trying to recover. This dismal assessment of Kant’s contributions to the evolution of accounts of mathematical necessity is fundamentally backward-looking. Coffa’s account of how semantic theories of the a priori evolved out of Kant’s doctrine of pure intuition rightly emphasizes those developments, both scientific and philosophical, that collectively served to undermine the plausibility of Kant’s account. What is missing from Coffa’s story, apart from any recognition of Kant’s semantic innovations, is an attempt to appreciate Kant’s philosophical context and the distinctive perspective from which Kant viewed issues in the philosophy of mathematics. When Kant’s perspective and context are brought out, he can not only be seen to have made a genuinely progressive contribution to the development of accounts of mathematical necessity, but also to be relevant to contemporary issues in the philosophy of mathematics in underappreciated ways.
|Keywords||Kant Alberto Coffa Intuition Necessity Mathematics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press.
Immanuel Kant (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood). Cambridge.
Immanuel Kant (2007/1951). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 507-508.
Michael Friedman (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press.
Paul Benacerraf (1973). Mathematical Truth. Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Sutherland (2005). Kant on Fundamental Geometrical Relations. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2):117-158.
Alberto Coffa (1991). The Semantic Tradition From Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Mormann (2009). Completions, Constructions, and Corollaries. In H. Pulte, G. Hanna & H.-J. Jahnke (eds.), Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives. Springer
Lisa Shabel (2003). Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice. Routledge.
Lisa Shabel (2003). Reflections on Kant's Concept (and Intuition) of Space. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):45-57.
Frode Kjosavik (2009). Kant on Geometrical Intuition and the Foundations of Mathematics. Kant-Studien 100 (1):1-27.
Alan Richardson (1994). Alberto Coffa, The Semantic Tradition From Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 61 (1):142-.
Lisa Shabel (1998). Kant on the `Symbolic Construction' of Mathematical Concepts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (4):589-621.
C. Pigden (1994). Review: Coffa, The Semantic Tradition From Carnap to Kant: To the Vienna Station. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (4):522-525.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #54,923 of 1,780,278 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #122,051 of 1,780,278 )
How can I increase my downloads?