David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio Juris 25 (3):393-408 (2012)
Ronald Dworkin states in his preface to “Law's Empire” (1986) that he is doing a phenomenology of law. In regards to a phenomenology of law, I wish to investigate Dworkin's theory of law, and subsequently, what is left out in order for it to be considered a phenomenological account. In doing so, I will compare Dworkin's phenomenology of law to Schütz's phenomenology of the social world. The comparison between the two will illuminate what I believe is necessary for law, and that is a Phenomenology of the Pre-Legal
|Keywords||Phenomenology Philosophy of Law Pre-Legal Ronald Dworkin Alfred Schütz|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
R. M. Dworkin (1988). Law's Empire. Harvard University Press.
Alfred Schutz (2007). The Phenomenology of the Social World*. In Craig J. Calhoun (ed.), Contemporary Sociological Theory. Blackwell Pub. 2--32.
Alfred Schutz (1967). Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press.
Alfred Schutz (1973). The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Scott Hershovitz (ed.) (2006). Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
Thom Brooks (2005). Hegel's Ambiguous Contribution to Legal Theory. Res Publica 11 (1):85-94.
Thom Brooks (2007). Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory. Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Ronald Dworkin (ed.) (1977). The Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.
Neil MacCormick (1978). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Naomi Choi (2007). Interpretivism in Jurisprudence: What Difference Does the Philosophy of History Make to the Philosophy of Law? Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):365-393.
Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (2001). Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
R. P. Peerenboom (1990). A Coup d'État in Law's Empire: Dworkin's Hercules Meets Atlas. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 9 (1):95 - 113.
Thomas D. Eisele (1988). Review Essay / Dworkin's “Full Political Theory of Law”. Criminal Justice Ethics 7 (2):49-66.
Scott J. Shapiro (2007). The "Hart-Dworkin" Debate : A Short Guide for the Perplexed. In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press 22--49.
Timothy Endicott (2001). Are There Any Rules? Journal of Ethics 5 (3):199-219.
Jeremy Waldron (2006). Did Dworkin Ever Answer the Crits? In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press
Rebecca L. Brown (2006). How Constitutional Theory Found its Soul : The Contributions of Ronald Dworkin. In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press
Added to index2012-08-04
Total downloads18 ( #206,083 of 1,906,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,378 of 1,906,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?