How do scientists reach agreement about novel observations?
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (2):205-230 (1986)
| Abstract | I outline a pragmatic view of scientists' use of observation which draws attention to non-discursive, instrumental and social contexts of observation, in order to explain scientists' agreement about the appearance and significance of new phenomena. I argue that: observation is embedded in a network of activities, techniques, and interests; that experimentalists make construals of new phenomena which enable them communicate exploratory techniques and their outcomes, and that empirical enquiry consists of communicative, exploratory and predictive strategies whose interdependence ensures that, notwithstanding the constructedness of representations and the empirical underdetermination of theories, observations contain information about the natural world | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn D. Greenwood (1990). Two Dogmas of Neo-Empiricism: The "Theory-Informity" of Observation and the Quine-Duhem Thesis. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):553-574.
D. G. Ellson (1963). The Scientists' Criterion of True Observation. Philosophy of Science 30 (1):41-52.
Robert Nola (1990). Some Observations on a Popperian Experiment Concerning Observation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 21 (2):329-346.
Henry A. Finch (1960). Confirming Power of Observations Metricized for Decisions Among Hypotheses. Philosophy of Science 27 (3):293-307.
Henry A. Finch (1960). Confirming Power of Observations Metricized for Decisions Among Hypotheses, Part II. Philosophy of Science 27 (4):391-404.
David Gooding (1990). Theory and Observation: The Experimental Nexus. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):131 – 148.
William P. Bechtel (forthcoming). The Epistemology of Evidence in Cognitive Neuroscience. In R. Skipper Jr, C. Allen, R. A. Ankeny, C. F. Craver, L. Darden, G. Mikkelson & and R. Richardson (eds.), Philosophy and the Life Sciences: A Reader. Mit Press.
Douglas M. Snyder (1995). Negative Observations in Quantum Mechanics. In [Book Chapter].
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (2002). Scientific Inference and the Pursuit of Fame: A Contractarian Approach. Philosophy of Science 69 (2):300-323.
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (2002). Scientific Inference and the Pursuit of Fame: A Contractarian Approach. Philosophy of Science 69 (2):300-323.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart (2004). Neuroscience and the Art of Single-Cell Recordings. Biology and Philosophy 18 (1):195-208.
Julie Zahle (2012). Practical Knowledge and Participant Observation. Inquiry 55 (1):50 - 65.
David C. Gooding (2006). Visual Cognition: Where Cognition and Culture Meet. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):688-698.
Theodore J. Everett (2010). Observation and Induction. Logos and Episteme 1 (2):303-324.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads2 ( #232,265 of 548,979 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
