Reduction by molecular genetics

Philosophy of Science 45 (1):73-95 (1978)
Taking reduction in the traditional deductive sense, the programmatic claim that most of genetics can be reduced by molecular genetics is defended as feasible and significant. Arguments by Ruse and Hull that either the relationship is replacement or at best a weaker form of reduction are shown to rest on a mixture of historical and logical confusions about the nature of the theories involved
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/288780
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,357
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Noam A. Chomsky (1980). Rules and Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (127):1-61.
John R. Searle (1980). Rules and Causation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):37.
Daniel C. Dennett (1980). Passing the Buck to Biology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):19.
Noam Chomsky (1980). Rules and Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):1.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

196 ( #17,078 of 1,911,370 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

43 ( #15,528 of 1,911,370 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.