Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 63 (1):73 - 100 (2005)
|Abstract||The paper tries to develop Bartels’s modern essentialism as a structural-role theory of identity for spacetime points. I adopt Hoefer’s idea of denying primitive identity for this theory and apply it to GTR and prerelativistic physics to find different versions of essentialism and different definitions of determinism which are coherent with them. I also try to argue that modified essentialism helps us to refute objections raised against essentialism and offers us the best understanding of prerelativistic and relativistic theories.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Neil E. Williams (2011). Putnam's Traditional Neo-Essentialism. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):151 - 170.
James D. Carney & P. von Bretzel (1973). Modern Materialism and Essentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (May):78-81.
Toby Handfield (2001). Dispositional Essentialism and the Possibility of a Law-Abiding Miracle. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):484-494.
Robin Findlay Hendry & Darrell P. Rowbottom (2009). Dispositional Essentialism and the Necessity of Laws. Analysis 69 (4):668-677.
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism. Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Charlotte Witt (forthcoming). What Is Gender Essentialism? Feminist Metaphysics:11--25.
Achille Varzi (2000). Topological Essentialism. Philosophical Studies 100 (3):217 - 236.
Andreas Bartels (1996). Modern Essentialism and the Problem of Individuation of Spacetime Points. Erkenntnis 45 (1):25--43.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,772 of 739,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?