The difference between lonely old ladies and CCTV cameras: A response to Ryberg

Res Publica 14 (1):43-47 (2008)
This article considers the question of whether it is meaningful to speak of privacy rights in public spaces, and the possibility of such rights framing the basis for regulating or restricting the use of surveillance technologies such as closed circuit television (CCTV). In particular, it responds to a recent article by Jesper Ryberg that suggests that there is little difference between being watched by private individuals and CCTV cameras, and instead argues that state surveillance is qualitatively different from (and more problematic than) surveillance by ‘lonely old ladies’.
Keywords CCTV  Surveillance  Privacy rights  Public spaces
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-008-9045-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,720
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Tony Doyle & Judy Veranas (2014). Public Anonymity and the Connected World. Ethics and Information Technology 16 (3):207-218.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #143,358 of 1,937,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #99,121 of 1,937,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.