David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):131-141 (2012)
Understanding what is distinctive about the role of models in science requires characterizing broad patterns in how these models evolve in the face of experimental results. That is, we must examine not just model statics—how the model relates to theory, or represents the world, at some point in time—but also model dynamics—how the model both generates new experimental results and is modified in response to them. Visual representations of structure play a central role in the theoretical reasoning of organic chemists. Not surprisingly, these representations have changed in important ways–in response to experimental and theoretical developments– throughout the history of organic chemistry. In many cases it is appropriate to understand the visual representations used by organic chemists as models. The evolution of the structural representations of organic chemists therefore provides a clear example of the dynamics of scientific modeling. In this paper I use a conception of scientific modeling drawn from the work of Mary Hesse to examine how the concept of a molecular conformation was incorporated into the visual representations of structure used by organic chemists
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher W. Pawlowski (2006). Dynamic Landscapes, Stability and Ecological Modeling. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (1).
Jennifer D. Ryan & Neal J. Cohen (2001). The Existence of Internal Visual Memory Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1002-1003.
David J. Chalmers (1990). Syntactic Transformations on Distributed Representations. Connection Science 2:53-62.
Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (2012). Mathematical Modeling in Biology: Philosophy and Pragmatics. Frontiers in Plant Evolution and Development 2012:1-3.
William Mark Goodwin (2009). Visual Representations in Science. Philosophy of Science 76 (3):372-390.
Martha Blassnigg (2010). Revisiting Marey's Applications of Scientific Moving Image Technologies in the Context of Bergson's Philosophy: Audio-Visual Mediation and the Experience of Time. [REVIEW] Medicine Studies 2 (3):175-184.
Shimon Edelman & Nathan Intrator (2003). Towards Structural Systematicity in Distributed, Statically Bound Visual Representations. Cognitive Science 23 (1):73-110.
Brian Epstein (2011). Agent-Based Modeling and the Fallacies of Individualism. In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. Routledge. 115444.
Edmund T. Rolls (2006). Consciousness Absent and Present: A Neurophysiological Exploration of Masking. In Haluk Ögmen & Bruno G. Breitmeyer (eds.), The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes. Mit Press. 89-108.
Michael Weisberg (2007). Who is a Modeler? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):207 - 233.
Bai-Lian Li (2002). A Theoretical Framework of Ecological Phase Transitions for Characterizing Tree-Grass Dynamics. Acta Biotheoretica 50 (3).
Michael A. Arbib & Péter Érdi (2000). Précis of Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):513-533.
Shimon Edelman & Nathan Intrator (2002). Visual Processing of Object Structure. In M. Arbib (ed.), The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Mit Press.
Added to index2012-10-04
Total downloads9 ( #168,764 of 1,140,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #60,710 of 1,140,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?