Graduate studies at Western
Consciousness and Cognition 2 (4):264-280 (1993)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alison Gopnik (1993). The Psychopsychology of the Fringe. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (2):109-112.
Alison Gopnik (1996). Reply to Commentators. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):552-561.
Miriam Solomon (1996). Commentary on Alison Gopnik's "the Scientist as Child". Philosophy of Science 63 (4):547-551.
Alison Gopnik (2009). Rational Constructivism: A New Way to Bridge Rationalism and Empiricism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):208-209.
Alison Gopnik (1988). Conceptual and Semantic Development as Theory Change: The Case of Object Permanence. Mind and Language 3 (3):197-216.
Alison Gopnik & Andrew N. Meltzoff (1994). Minds, Bodies, and Persons: Young Children's Understanding of the Self and Others as Reflected in Imitation and Theory of Mind Research. In S. T. Parker, R. Mitchell & M. L. Boccia (eds.), Self-Awareness in Animals and Humans: Developmental Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Alison Gopnik & H. M. Wellman (1992). Why the Child's Theory of Mind Really is a Theory. Mind and Language 7 (1-2):145-71.
Alison Gopnik (2003). The Theory Theory as an Alternative to the Innateness Hypothesis. In Louise M. Antony (ed.), Chomsky and His Critics. Blackwell.
Luc Faucher, Ron Mallon, Daniel Nazer, Shaun Nichols, Stephen Stich & Jonathan Weinberg, The Baby in the Lab-Coat: Why Child Development Is Not an Adequate Model for Understanding the Development of Science.
Alison Gopnik & Andrew N. Meltzoff (1998). Theories Vs. Modules: To the Max and Beyond: A Reply to Poulin-Dubois and to Stich and Nichols. Mind and Language 13 (3):450-456.
Daniel Nazer, Aaron Ruby, Shaun Nichols, Jonathan Weinberg, Stephen Stich, Luc Faucher & Ron Mallon (2002). The Baby in the Lab-Coat: Why Child Development is Not an Adequate Model for Understanding the Development of Science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich & M. Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Alison Gopnik (1998). What Can Externalism Do for Psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):73-74.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-11-01
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?