Gillespie on Singer's generalization argument
Ethics 95 (1):75-77 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Buckle (2005). Peter Singer's Argument for Utilitarianism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):175-194.
Richard Hanley (2004). A Modest Proposal. Public Affairs Quarterly 18.
Jurgen Schroder (2002). The Supervenience Argument and the Generalization Problem. Erkenntnis 56 (3):319-28.
Robert A. Skipper Jr (2006). Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics: Drift Versus Draft. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):655-665.
Robert Skipper (2006). Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics: Drift Versus Draft. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):655-665.
Roland Paul Blum (1970). The True Function of the Generalization Argument. Inquiry 13 (1-4):274 – 288.
David Keyt (1963). Singer's Generalization Argument. Philosophical Review 72 (4):466-476.
Norman C. Gillespie (1975). A Valid Deduction of the Generalization Argument. Ethics 86 (1):87-91.
J. Howard Sobel (1967). 'Everyone', Consequences, and Generalization Arguments. Inquiry 10 (1-4):373-404.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #134,900 of 556,808 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,808 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
