Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):654-655 (2008)
|Abstract||I ask whether it is necessary that principles of number be mentally represented and point to the role of language in determining cultural variation. Some cultures possess extensive counting systems that are finite. I suggest that learning number principles is similar to learning conservation and, as such, might be derived from learning about the empirical properties of objects and other individuals in combinations|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brian Butterworth & Robert Reeve (2008). Verbal Counting and Spatial Strategies in Numerical Tasks: Evidence From Indigenous Australia. Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):443 – 457.
Len Taing & Jeffrey Lidz, The Development of “Most” Comprehension and Its Potential Dependence on Counting Ability in Preschoolers.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (2007). Linguistic Determinism and the Innate Basis of Number. In Peter Carruthers (ed.), The Innate Mind: Foundations and the Future.
Gedeon Deák, Hong Li, Yiyuan Li, Bihua Cao & Fuhong Li (2011). The Law of Large Numbers in Children's Diversity-Based Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 15 (4):388-404.
Joseph Melia (1995). On What There's Not. Analysis 55 (4):223 - 229.
Jeremie Hughes (1988). Will My Rabbit Go to Heaven?: And Other Questions Children Ask. Lion Pub. Corp..
Peter Worley (2009). Philosophy in Philosophy in Schools. Think 8 (23):63-75.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #155,026 of 740,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?