Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 54 (2):126-139 (2011)
|Abstract||In his book A Secular Age, Charles Taylor appeals to the metaphysical?normative distinction between ?immanence? and ?transcendence? as definitive for post-Axial religion. On Taylor's view, therefore, those of us who embrace a fully secular modernity can be described as having abandoned ?transcendence? to take up our lives wholly within the confines of the immanent frame, though he grants we may seek alternative satisfactions or ?substitutes? for eternity. But the notion that any metaphysical?normative model of sacred experience can serve as an irresistible foundation is open to doubt if one recalls the Heideggerian insight that any metaphysical picture both reveals and conceals aspects of our experience. Taylor's own description of sacred and non-sacred experience within the immanent frame seems to rely upon this foundational distinction, without entertaining the possibility that the language itself may very well actually distort what our experience is like. This paper pursues the above objections to Taylor's argument, focusing special attention on the assumption that one can judge aesthetic experience (such as listening to a Beethoven string quartet) with the criteria we have inherited from post-Axial religion. The overwhelming authority of the Axial tradition might seem to validate questions such as, ?Is there an object?? or ?Is the experience purely immanent?? But to such questions we might respond that such language simply has no grip on the phenomena. Any such talk of ?substitution? might therefore be understood as an historical remnant in Taylor's book of the traditional monotheist's critique of idolatry|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leon Rappoport (1989). Entering the Sacred: Prologue to a Theory of Transcendent Consciousness. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 9 (1):12-19.
Eugene Thomas Long (2006). Suffering and Transcendence. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60 (1/3):139 - 148.
L. Michael Harrington (2004). Sacred Place in Early Medieval Neoplatonism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Isabelle Sabau (2008). The Sacred in the Visual Arts. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:239-246.
John Caruana (2002). Lévinas's Critique of the Sacred. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4):519-534.
Imants Baruss (2008). Beliefs About Consciousness and Reality: Clarification of the Confusion Concerning Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (s 10-11):277-292.
Vinit Haksar (1998). Collective Rights and the Value of Groups. Inquiry 41 (1):21 – 43.
T. J. Mawson (2005). 'Byrne's' Religious Pluralism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (1):37 - 54.
Kenneth Maly (1993). Sacred Land, Sacred Sex: Rapture of the Deep. Environmental Ethics 15 (3):275-277.
R. Hanson, Hilda D. Oakeley, Alexander Mair & Clement C. J. Webb (1924). Symposium: The Idea of a Transcendent Deity: Is the Belief in a Transcendent God Philosophically Tenable? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 4:197 - 240.
Cesáreo Bandera (1995). Book Review: The Sacred Game: The Role of the Sacred in the Genesis of Modern Literary Fiction. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (1).
Andrew J. McKenna (1995). Book Review: The Sacred Game: The Role of the Sacred in the Genesis of Modern Literary Fiction. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (1):189-191.
Vincent J. DeVendra (2011). A Science With No Scientists? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:283-294.
Added to index2011-03-22
Total downloads23 ( #60,238 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?