David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sartre Studies International 15 (1):39-53 (2009)
One of the basic intuitions guiding Sartre's phenomenological works is that phenomena cannot be reduced to essences that are separate from appearances. Such a separation leads to a type of semiotic profusion that Sartre criticizes in L'Etre et le néant by evoking the example of Proust. Sartre's ontology must avoid this infinite proliferation of meaning without falling into a type of essentialism where things are merely what they appear to be. Sartre's references to Proust demonstrate not only the pitfalls of essentialism and unlimited semiosis, but also why Sartre found it necessary to invent existential psychoanalysis as a response to the twin phenomenological challenge of situating intentional meaning neither on the side of the object, nor of the subject, but somewhere in between. The unsatisfactory nature of Sartre's solution is palpable in the contradictions we discover in his observations on Proust
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ivan Mladenov (2001). Unlimited Semiosis and Heteroglossia (C. S. Peirce and M. M. Bakhtin). Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):441-460.
Kathy L. Schuh (2000). Unlimited Semiosis. Semiotics:280-295.
Leena Kakkori & Rauno Huttunen (2010). The Sartre-Heidegger Controversy on Humanism and the Concept of Man in Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (4):351-365.
Thomas W. Busch (1972). Sartre : From Phenomenology to Marxism. Research in Phenomenology 2 (1):111-120.
Robert Denoon Cumming (1991). Phenomenology and Deconstruction. University of Chicago Press.
John Hawthorne & Tamar Szabó Gendler (2000). Origin Essentialism: The Arguments Reconsidered. Mind 109 (434):285-298.
David S. Oderberg (2007). Real Essentialism. Routledge.
Birgit Nordtug (2004). Subjectivity as an Unlimited Semiosis: Lacan and Peirce. Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (2/3):87-102.
James Schmidt (1979). Lordship and Bondage in Merleau-Ponty and Sartre. Political Theory 7 (2):201-227.
John M. Moreland (1973). For-Itself and in-Itself in Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today 17 (4):311-318.
T. Robertson (1998). Possibilities and the Arguments for Origin Essentialism. Mind 107 (428):729-750.
Sebastian Gardner (2006). Sartre, Schelling, and Onto-Theology. Religious Studies 42 (3):247-271.
Paul Bouissac (1981). Figurative Versus Objective Semiosis. Semiotics:3-12.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads6 ( #288,336 of 1,696,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #333,709 of 1,696,247 )
How can I increase my downloads?