Philosophical and methodological issues in understanding transportation impacts: Learning from other disciplines
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
It is the premise of this paper that many disciplines, within the social sciences and outside of them, look at exactly these sorts of compound questions; that it is possible and useful to look how various disciplines identify and phrase such questions and also to look at the various methods that are employed to gain answers to them; that knowledge gained from other disciplines in these respects can then be applied to improve public policy analysis; and that new methods, or more likely and more properly speaking, hybrids of existing methods, or research protocols derived from them, can then be developed for actual use by public policy analysts. This paper will take a very preliminary stab at developing these premises in a concrete fashion. First some philosophical issues surrounding "social science" inquiry will be discussed. Then, using the particular case of forensic entomology (the use of insect science to solve crimes), a stylized investigate protocol is developed and then applied to a simple case of the urban economic development impacts of highway investments to see how seemingly unrelated disciplines might inform each other in setting up and examining specific problems. Finally, an agenda for further research is then discussed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
W. J. Steen (1980). The Classification of Disciplines in Biology: A Plea for Pluralism. Acta Biotheoretica 29 (2).
Matthew Kearnes & Matthias Wienroth (2011). Tools of the Trade: UK Research Intermediaries and the Politics of Impacts. [REVIEW] Minerva 49 (2):153-174.
A. G. (2000). The Assembly of Geophysics: Scientific Disciplines as Frameworks of Consensus. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (3):259-292.
Barry Bozeman & Daniel Sarewitz (2011). Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation. Minerva 49 (1):1-23.
Arne Næss (1961). The Inquiring Mind. Inquiry 4 (1-4):162 – 189.
Mano Daniel & Lester E. Embree (eds.) (1994). Phenomenology of the Cultural Disciplines. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kenneth Watt (2003). What Can the Systems Community Contribute to Ensure the Survival of Civilization. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):241 – 251.
Richard Norgaard & Paul Baer (2003). Seeing the Whole Picture. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):225 – 239.
Sven Ove Hansson (2008). Philosophy and Other Disciplines. Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):472-483.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #807,299 of 1,911,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,075 of 1,911,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?