David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):177-190 (1996)
The author agrees with James Moor that computer technology, because it is ‘logically malleable’, is bringing about a genuine social revolution. Moor compares the computer revolution to the ‘industrial revolution’ of the late 18th and the 19th centuries; but it is argued here that a better comparison is with the ‘printing press revolution’ that occurred two centuries before that. Just as the major ethical theories of Bentham and Kant were developed in response to the printing press revolution, so a new ethical theory is likely to emerge from computer ethics in response to the computer revolution. The newly emerging field of information ethics, therefore, is much more important than even its founders and advocates believe.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James H. Moor (1985). What is Computer Ethics? Metaphilosophy 16 (4):266-275.
James H. Moor (1995). Is Ethics Computable? Metaphilosophy 26 (1-2):1-21.
Citations of this work BETA
Charles Ess (2008). Luciano Floridi's Philosophy of Information and Information Ethics: Critical Reflections and the State of the Art. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):89-96.
Mikko Siponen (2004). A Pragmatic Evaluation of the Theory of Information Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):279-290.
Edward H. Spence & Aaron Quinn (2008). Information Ethics as a Guide for New Media. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (4):264 – 279.
Terrell Ward Bynum & Simon Rogerson (1996). Introduction and Overview: Global Information Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):131-136.
Edward H. Spence (2009). A Universal Model for the Normative Evaluation of Internet Information. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):243-253.
Similar books and articles
Chris W. Surprenant (2005). A Reconciliation of Kant's Views on Revolution. Interpretation 32 (2):151-169.
Lorne Tepperman (1985). Informatics and Society: Will There Be an 'Information Revolution'? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (5):395 - 399.
Walter Maner (1996). Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):137-154.
Michael J. Quinn (2006). On Teaching Computer Ethics Within a Computer Science Department. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):335-343.
James H. Moor (1999). Just Consequentialism and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):61-65.
TerrellWard Bynum (2001). Computer Ethics: Its Birth and its Future. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):109-112.
James H. Moor (2001). The Future of Computer Ethics: You Ain't Seen Nothin' Yet! [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):89-91.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads159 ( #23,658 of 1,911,238 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #68,716 of 1,911,238 )
How can I increase my downloads?