David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):193-217 (2007)
In this article, we explore the implications of a Rawlsian theory for intergenerational issues. First, we confront Rawls's way of locating his `just savings' principle in his Theory of Justice with an alternative way of doing so. We argue that both sides of his intergenerational principle, as they apply to the accumulation phase and the steady-state stage, can be dealt with on the bases, respectively, of the principle of equal liberty (and its priority) and of the difference principle. We then proceed by focusing on the implications of applying maximin to his steady-state stage. One central claim is that, in principle, Rawlsians should consider not only generational dissavings, but also generational savings, as unfair. This principle suffers a series of exceptions on which we focus in the fourth section of the article. In some cases, growth can be maximin compatible. Key Words: generations • egalitarianism • maximin • sustainability • growth • difference principle • John Rawls.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Catriona McKinnon (2011). Climate Change Justice: Getting Motivated in the Last Chance Saloon. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):195-213.
Similar books and articles
F. Gaspart & A. Gosseries (2007). Are Generational Savings Unjust? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):193-217.
Xxxx (2007). Xxxx. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):193-217.
Steven Wall (2003). Just Savings and the Difference Principle. Philosophical Studies 116 (1):79-102.
Axel Gosseries (2002). La justice entre les générations. Faut-il renoncer au maximin intergénérationnel ? Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 107 (1):61-81.
Larry A. Alexander (1985). Fair Equality of Opportunity. Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
Peter Koller (1983). Rawls' Differenzprinzip Und Seine Deutungen. Erkenntnis 20 (1):1 - 25.
Nir Eyal (2005). ‘Perhaps the Most Important Primary Good’: Self-Respect and Rawls’s Principles of Justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (2):195-219.
Roger Paden (1997). Rawls's Just Savings Principle and the Sense of Justice. Social Theory and Practice 23 (1):27-51.
Axel Gosseries (2008). Theories of Intergenerational Justice: A Synopsis. Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc 1:39-49.
Volkert Beekman (2004). Sustainable Development and Future Generations. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):3-22.
Rodney G. Peffer (2008). A Modified Rawlsian Theory of Social Justice: “Justice as Fair Rights”. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:593-608.
Steven Wall (2012). Rescuing Justice From Equality. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):180-212.
Allan F. Gibbard, Disparate Goods and Rawls' Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment.
Richard J. Arneson (1999). Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Gillian Brock (2005). Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Added to index2011-01-21
Total downloads11 ( #146,995 of 1,168,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #85,406 of 1,168,893 )
How can I increase my downloads?