Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research

Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):191 – 194 (2001)
Smythe and Murray (2000) presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research (NR) in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,037
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
James Weber (1992). Scenarios in Business Ethics Research. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2):137-160.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #378,786 of 1,934,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #145,801 of 1,934,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.