Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):193-194 (2002)
|Abstract||Pylyshyn raises hot topics like the number and kinds of pictorialist theories there are and their explanatory power. Pylyshyn states that pictorialists have only two possibilities – they can posit either “only functional” images or “really spatial” images – and that neither of these possibilities is convincing or sufficient in explanatory power for empirical and theoretical reasons. Is pictorialism, in principle, untenable?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patrick A. Heelan (1983). Space-Perception And The Philosophy Of Science. University Of California Press.
Robert C. Cummins (1975). Functional Analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.
Norman H. Anderson (1997). Functional Memory Versus Reproductive Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):19-20.
Kim Sterelny (1986). The Imagery Debate. Philosophy of Science 53 (December):560-83.
José Iovino (1997). Definability in Functional Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):493-505.
John Hawthorne & Theodore Sider (2002). Locations. Philosophical Topics 30 (1):53-76.
Rob Vanderbeeken (2006). Can Intentional and Functional Explanations of Actions Coexist? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:143-147.
Michael Tye (1987). Representation in Pictorialism and Connectionism. Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 26 (S1):163-184.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #86,055 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?