David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1987)
Aristotle's biological works - constituting over 25% of his surviving corpus and for centuries largely unstudied by philosophically oriented scholars - have been the subject of an increasing amount of attention of late. This collection brings together some of the best work that has been done in this area, with the aim of exhibiting the contribution that close study of these treatises can make to the understanding of Aristotle's philosophy. The book is divided into four parts, each with an introduction which places its essays in relation to each other and to the wider issues of the book as a whole. The first part is an overview of the relationship of Aristotle's biology to his philosophy; the other three each concentrate on a set of issues central to Aristotelian study - definition and demonstration; teleology and necessity in nature; and metaph themes such as the unity of matter and form and the nature of substance.
|Keywords||Biology Philosophy Biology History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$29.53 used (51% off) $53.45 new (11% off) $59.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||QH331.P465 1987|
|ISBN(s)||052132582X 0521310911 9780521310918|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher J. Austin (forthcoming). Aristotelian Essentialism: Essence in the Age of Evolution. Synthese:1-18.
James Dominic Rooney (2013). Evolutionary Biology and Classical Teleological Arguments for God's Existence. Heythrop Journal 54 (4):617-630.
Alan C. Love (2005). The Return of the Embryo. Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):567-584.
Matthias Kuhle & Sabine Kuhle (2010). Connecting Information with Scientific Method: Darwin's Significance for Epistemology. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):333 - 357.
Matthias Kuhle & Sabine Kuhle (2010). Connecting Information with Scientific Method: Darwin’s Significance for Epistemology. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):333-357.
Similar books and articles
Jane Maienschein & Michael Ruse (eds.) (1999). Biology and the Foundation of Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Marjorie Grene (2004). The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History. Cambridge University Press.
Yrjö Haila & Peter Taylor (2001). The Philosophical Dullness of Classical Ecology, and a Levinsian Alternative. Biology and Philosophy 16 (1):93-102.
Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.) (2000). Biology and Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
James G. Lennox (1994). Putting Philosophy of Science to the Test: The Case of Aristotle's Biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:239 - 247.
Sahotra Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.) (2008). A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell Pub..
James G. Lennox & Robert Bolton (eds.) (2010). Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf. Cambridge University Press.
James G. Lennox (1984). Marjorie Grene, Aristotle's Philosophy of Science and Aristotle's Biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:365 - 377.
James G. Lennox (2001). Aristotle's Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #160,314 of 1,907,137 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #276,357 of 1,907,137 )
How can I increase my downloads?