Different vulnerabilities for addiction may contribute to the same phenomena and some additional interactions
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):445-446 (2008)
The framework for addiction offered by the target article can perhaps be simplified into fewer, more basic, vulnerabilities. covers a number of vulnerabilities, not just enhanced delay discounting. Real-world drug-use decisions involve both delay and probability discounting. The motivational salience of, and attentional bias for, drug cues may be related to a number of vulnerabilities. Interactions among vulnerabilities are of significance and complicate the application of this framework
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Marc Wittmann & Martin P. Paulus (2008). Decision Making, Impulsivity and Time Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):7-12.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bennett Foddy (2011). Addicted to Food, Hungry for Drugs. Neuroethics 4 (2):79-89.
Jon Elster (ed.) (1999). Addiction: Entries and Exits. Russell Sage Publications.
Paul Gilbert (2004). Threat, Safeness, and Schizophrenia: Hidden Issues in an Evolutionary Story. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):858-859.
Helen Keane (2004). Disorders of Desire: Addiction and Problems of Intimacy. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):189-204.
Wayne Hall (2003). Addiction, Neuroscience and Ethics. Addiction 98 (7):867-870.
A. David Redish, Steve Jensen & Adam Johnson (2008). A Unified Framework for Addiction: Vulnerabilities in the Decision Process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):415-437.
A. David Redish, Steve Jensen & Adam Johnson (2008). Addiction as Vulnerabilities in the Decision Process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):461-487.
George Ainslie (2008). Vulnerabilities to Addiction Must Have Their Impact Through the Common Currency of Discounted Reward. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):438-439.
Alison M. Jaggar (2009). Transnational Cycles of Gendered Vulnerability. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):33-52.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #281,668 of 1,096,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #102,815 of 1,096,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?