David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (8):874-887 (2011)
North American music education is a commodity sold to pre-service and in-service music teachers. Like all mass-produced consumables, it is valuable to the extent that it is not creative, that is, to the extent that it is reproducible. This is demonstrated in curricular materials, notably general music series textbook and music scores available from a rapidly shrinking cadre of publishers, as well as rigid and pre-determined pedagogical practices. Distributing resources and techniques that produce predicable, consistent, and repeatable goods and services, the economy of music teacher preparation and development must necessarily exclude creativity, which consequently must be viewed as not only inefficient but unprofitable. More than undesirable, however, creativity is constructed as dangerous as it injects difference in a system that relies on sameness. Because of its implications for music education discourse and practices, I focus my discussion on research in general and feminist critique in particular in music education. Reading through Monique Wittig's ‘The Trojan Horse’ as literary war machine, I argue that creative writing and academic research are not mutually exclusive, and that it is only through infusing the literary or creative in scholarly writing that interlocking systems of oppression may be altered and difference implicated in music education. My analysis of Roberta Lamb's (1995) research piece, ‘Tone Deaf/Symphonies Singing: Sketches for a Musicale’ depicts it as Trojan Horse, albeit one that Lamb herself, most likely as a function of editorial imperative, hobbles
|Keywords||research music education Trojan Horse war machine creative|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilles Deleuze (1994). Difference and Repetition. Athlone Press.
Roberta Lamb (forthcoming). Feminism as Critique in Philosophy of Music Education. Philosophy of Music Education Review.
Elizabeth Grierson (2007). Difference: A Critical Investigation of the Creative Arts with Attention to Art as a Site of Knowledge. Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (5):531–542.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Frede V. Nielsen (2005). Didactology as a Field of Theory and Research in Music Education. Philosophy of Music Education Review 13 (1):5-19.
Elvira Panaiotidi (2002). What Is Philosophy of Music Education and Do We Really Need It? Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (3):229-252.
Frede V. Nielsen (2009). What is the Significance of Research for Music Education in Practice? On Relations Between the Practice of and the Scientific Approach to Music Education. Philosophy of Music Education Review 17 (1):22-40.
Eleni Lapidaki (2007). Learning From Masters of Music Creativity: Shaping Compositional Experiences in Music Education. Philosophy of Music Education Review 15 (2):93-117.
Wing-Wah Law & Wai-Chung Ho (2004). Values Education in Hong Kong School Music Education: A Sociological Critique. British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (1):65 - 82.
Carolyn Beckingham (2009). Moribund Music: Can Classical Music Be Saved? Sussex Academic Press.
Jenefer Robinson (ed.) (1997). Music & Meaning. Cornell University Press.
Peter Howarth (2007). Creative Writing and Schiller's Aesthetic Education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):41-58.
Elizabeth Gould (2009). Women Working in Music Education: The War Machine. Philosophy of Music Education Review 17 (2):126-143.
Added to index2009-11-10
Total downloads4 ( #405,327 of 1,725,417 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,420 of 1,725,417 )
How can I increase my downloads?