A Delicate Balance: What Philosophy Can Tell Us About Terrorism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Westview Press (2002)
Did the world change on September 11, 2001? For those who live outside of New York or Washington, life's familiar pace persists and families and jobs resume their routines. Yet everything seems different because of the dramatic disturbance in our sense of what our world means and how we exist within it. In A Delicate Balance , philosopher Trudy Govier writes that it is because our feelings and attitudes have altered so fundamentally that our world has changed. Govier believes that there are ethical challenges we cannot ignore. From Plato and Aristotle on courage to Kant on revenge, to 20th Century philosopher John Rawls’s views on justice, Govier mines the world of philosophy to reflect on terrorism. Govier argues that moral complexities such as victimhood, evil, power and revenge, if properly understood, can provide a basis for hope– not despair. Govier walks the reader through this shift, challenging us to construct a new sense of the world and our place within it.
|Keywords||Violence Terrorism September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$0.98 used (96% off) $3.98 new (82% off) $14.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1459.5.G68 2002|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Asa Kasher & Amos Yadlin (2005). Military Ethics of Fighting Terror: An Israeli Perspective†. Journal of Military Ethics 4 (1):3-32.
Adam Kadlac (2015). The Virtue of Hope. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (2):337-354.
J. Angelo Corlett (2007). Was 9/11 Morally Justified? Journal of Global Ethics 3 (1):107 – 123.
J. Angelo Corlett (2007). Was 9/11 Morally Justified? 1. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (1):107-123.
Similar books and articles
Trudy Govier (2005). Physical Violence in Political Conflicts : Grounds for a Strong Presumption Against Violence. In Timothy Shanahan (ed.), Philosophy 9/11: Thinking About the War on Terrorism. Open Court
Igor Primoratz (ed.) (2004). Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jürgen Habermas (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. University of Chicago Press.
Kristin Andrews (2006). Explaining Terrorism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:167-171.
Michael Giudice (2007). Understanding Anti-Terrorism Legislation. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:17-21.
Scott C. Lowe (2006). Defining Terrorism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:253-256.
Sarah Sorial (2011). Politics of Violence. Critical Horizons 12 (2):163-164.
Matthew J. Morgan (ed.) (2009). The Impact of 9/11 on Religion and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?