David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 36 (3-4):93- (1943)
The poem to which Callierges attached the title Hρακλσ ΛεοντοφῸνοσ from the narrative which occupies its last hundred lines falls into three sections, of which two have still, and all no doubt had originally, separate titles. In the first Herakles is found in conversation with a rustic who describes to him the estates of Augeias and accompanies him in search of that king. In the second the hero, in attendance on Augeias and his son Phyleus, inspects the royal flocks and herds as they return at night to their folds and byres, and astonishes the spectators by the ease with which he repels the attack of a mighty bull. In the third Herakles and Phyleus are discovered on their way to the neighbouring town. Phyleus has heard from an Achaean stranger some account of the death of the Nemean lion, suspects that its slayer may have been his companion, and questions him. Herakles in reply tells the story. The poem exhibits the same conception of epic narrative as is seen in the authentic works of Theocritus. There is the eye for landscape and the attention to setting conspicuous in Id. 13 and in Part 2 of Id. 22: the keying down of the miraculous and heroic conspicuous in Id. 24: the easy command and constant memory of Homer which is in T. not confined to epic subjects. There is, too, at leaste point of contact with Callimachus. Part 1, as has been said, is occupied by a conversation between a friendly rustic and Herakles, who, we must suppose, is seeking Augeias in order to clean out his cattle-byres. We know next to nothing of what passed in the Hekale of Calhmachus between that heroine and Theseus on his way to deal with the bull of Marathon, and nothing of what passed in the Aetia between Molorchos and Herakles on his way to kill the lion of Nemea; but both Hekale and Molorchos were treated as poor countryfolk who befriend a hero bound on a heroic mission, and, whatever may have been the divergences of handling, the agreement between the two poets in this far from obvious method of attacking an epic theme is noteworthy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Sargeaunt (1902). Gow's Horace, Satires I Horace, Satires I. Edited by James Gow, Litt. D., Head Master of Westminster: Cambridge University Press, 1901. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (02):127-128.
A. S. F. Gow (1935). Corrigendum. Classical Quarterly 29 (3-4):149-.
A. S. F. Gow (1962). Housmania. The Classical Review 12 (02):161-.
A. S. F. Gow (1927). Bucolica. The Classical Review 41 (05):166-169.
J. Gow (1915). Horatiana. The Classical Review 29 (03):75-76.
A. S. F. Gow (1944). Οφυσ. The Classical Review 58 (02):38-39.
A. S. F. Gow (1942). Theocritus, ID. Ii, 59–62. The Classical Review 56 (03):109-112.
A. S. F. Gow (1914). Notes on the Agamemnon. Classical Quarterly 8 (01):1-.
A. S. F. Gow (1916). On Two Passages of the Orestes. Classical Quarterly 10 (02):80-.
A. S. F. Gow (1958). Leonidas of Tarentum. Classical Quarterly 8 (3-4):113-.
A. S. F. Gow (1967). Mousers In Egypt. Classical Quarterly 17 (02):195-.
A. S. F. Gow (1968). On the Halieutica of Oppian. Classical Quarterly 18 (01):60-.
A. S. F. Gow (1940). Theocritus Id. VII. Classical Quarterly 34 (3-4):117-.
A. S. F. Gow (1940). Philology in Theocritus. Classical Quarterly 34 (3-4):113-.
A. S. F. Gow (1955). Two Epigrams by Diotimus. The Classical Review 5 (3-4):238-241.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads9 ( #342,145 of 1,790,544 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #106,758 of 1,790,544 )
How can I increase my downloads?