A note on Berkeley's conception of the mind
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (4):574-576 (1962)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Berman (2005). Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. Thoemmes Continuum.
Meredith Williams (1999). Wittgenstein, Mind, and Meaning: Toward a Social Conception of Mind. Routledge.
Branka Arsić (2003). The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (Via Beckett). Stanford University Press.
Genevieve Migely (2007). Berkeley's Actively Passive Mind. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.
Willis Doney (1982). Is Berkeley's a Cartesian Mind? In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
Lawrence A. Mirarchi (1982). Dynamical Implications of Berkeley's Doctrine of Heterogeneity: A Note on the Language Model of Nature. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
Michael Jacovides (2009). How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive. Philosophia 37 (3):415-429.
Walter Ott (2006). Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.
Douglas M. Jesseph (2005). Berkeley, God, and Explanation. In Christia Mercer (ed.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,615 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
