David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1987)
Each of the two major approaches to Aristotle--the unitarian, which understands his work as forming a single, unified system, and the developmentalist, which seeks a sequence of developing ideas--has inherent limitations. This book proposes a synthetic view of Aristotle that sees development as a change between systematic theories. Setting theories of the so-called logical works beside theories of the physical and metaphysical treatises, Graham shows that Aristotle's doctrines fall into two distinct systems of philosophies that are genetically related. This study--the first major alternative to the unitarian approach since Jaeger pioneered the developmentalist method in 1923--provides a sweeping reappraisal of Aristotle's science and metaphysics and a new approach to the problem of substance presented in the Metaphysics
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$20.00 used (70% off) $63.23 new (3% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B485.G584 1987|
|ISBN(s)||0198243154 0198249705 0198249705|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jerry Green (2014). The Underlying Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z.3. Phronesis 59 (4):321-342.
Nathanael Stein (2011). Causation and Explanation in Aristotle. Philosophy Compass 6 (10):699-707.
Steven J. Livesey (1990). Science and Theology in the Fourteenth Century: The Subalternate Sciences in Oxford Commentaries on the Sentences. Synthese 83 (2):273 - 292.
Miira Tuominen (2012). Philosophy of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle. Philosophy Compass 7 (12):852-895.
Similar books and articles
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1967). Aristotle. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
D. W. Hamlyn (1973). Aristotle's Metaphysical Argument Walter Leszl: Logic and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Aristotle's Treatment of Types of Equivocity and its Relevance to His Metaphysical Theories. Pp. Xiii+60i. Padua: Antenore, 1970. Paper, L. 9,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 23 (02):212-214.
Thomas K. Johansen (2012). Capacity and Potentiality: Aristotle's Metaphysics Θ.6–7 From the Perspective of the De Anima. Topoi 31 (2):209-220.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). The Aristotelian Method and Aristotelian Metaphysics. In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies. ATINER
Terence Irwin (1988). Aristotle's First Principles. Oxford University Press.
C. W. A. Whitaker (1996). Aristotle's de Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford University Press.
Frank A. Lewis (1991). Substance and Predication in Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
S. Marc Cohen, Aristotle's Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #262,404 of 1,793,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,309 of 1,793,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?