Mind and Society 8 (1):59-76 (2009)
|Abstract||The European market has faced a series of recurrent food scares, e.g. mad cow disease, chicken flu, dioxin poisoning in chickens, salmons and recently also in pigs (Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera , 07/12/2008). These food scares have had, in the short term, major socio-economic consequences, eroding consumer confidence and decreasing the willingness to buy potentially risky food products. The research reported in this paper considered the role of commitment to a food product in the context of food scares, and in particular the effect of commitment on the purchasing intentions of consumers, on their attitude towards the product, and on their trust in the food supply chain. After the initial commitment had been obtained, a threat scenario evoking a risk associated with a specific food was presented, and a wider, related request was then made. Finally, a questionnaire tested the effects of commitment on the participantsâ attitude towards the product. The results showed that previous commitment can increase consumersâ behavioural intention to purchase and their attitude towards the food product, even in the presence of a potential hazard.|
|Keywords||Food hazards Commitment Attitude Trust|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Franck L. B. Meijboom, Tatjana Visak & Frans W. A. Brom (2006). From Trust to Trustworthiness: Why Information is Not Enough in the Food Sector. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):427-442.
Paul Weirich (ed.) (2008). Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. OUP USA.
Iris Vermeir & Wim Verbeke (2006). Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (2):169-194.
Dirk Haen (forthcoming). The Paradox of E-Numbers: Ethical, Aesthetic, and Cultural Concerns in the Dutch Discourse on Food Additives. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics:1-16.
C. Clare Hinrichs & Patricia Allen (2008). Selective Patronage and Social Justice: Local Food Consumer Campaigns in Historical Context. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):329-352.
Mary K. Hendrickson, Harvey S. James & William D. Heffernan (2008). Does the World Need U.S. Farmers Even If Americans Don't? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):311-328.
K. Hendrickson Mary, S. James Harvey & D. Heffernan William (2008). Does the World Need U.S. Farmers Even If Americans Don't? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4).
Frans W. A. Brom (2000). Food, Consumer Concerns, and Trust: Food Ethics for a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):127-139.
M. Deblonde, R. de Graaff & F. Brom (2007). An Ethical Toolkit for Food Companies: Reflections on its Use. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):99-118.
Paisan Loaharanu & Mainuddin Ahmed (1991). Advantages and Disadvantages of the Use of Irradiation for Food Preservation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):14-30.
David Waltner-Toews (1991). One Ecosystem, One Food System: The Social and Ecological Context of Food Safety Strategies. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):49-59.
Hub Zwart (2000). A Short History of Food Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):113-126.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads1 ( #291,771 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?