Captivity or Autonomy? Philipp Melanchthon's Theological Anthropology
Inquiry 54 (5):460 - 477 (2011)
| Abstract | Abstract Theology may well provide useful insights into the question of human autonomy?if one is willing to entertain the existence and authority of God as expressed through the scriptures. Accordingly, the Bible presents humanity as designed to exercise much autonomy. But, humanity immediately abused that freedom, resulting in the present universal captivity of the human will to sin and death. The will can now only be liberated from its self-centered bondage through the substitutionary death and resurrection of the God?Man Jesus Christ, received by grace through faith (according to the Protestant soteriological framework). With the acceptance of Christ by faith, the Holy Spirit enters into the believer, causing the will to begin a process of regeneration in which the old self-centered deformation of the will is gradually liberated to a restoration of its original design?a God-centered existence characterized by freedom in pursuing a life of genuine love and righteousness. Within this general theological anthropology, Christians often disagree about the relative level of self-determination at the most crucial point?the decision of faith. Philipp Melanchthon (1497?1560) provides an excellent snapshot of this theological debate, due to the evolutionary character of his own teachings on the subject. In 1519, he taught that human beings had no freedom in the choice of faith. At his death in 1560, he taught that human beings did have (at least some) self-determination in this decision. A survey of this doctrinal transformation allows for an in-depth exploration of human autonomy from a theological perspective | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesS. J. Samartha & Lynn De Silva (eds.) (1979). Man in Nature: Guest or Engineer?: A Preliminary Enquiry by Christians and Buddhists Into the Religious Dimensions in Humanity's Relation to Nature. Ecumenical Institute for Study and Dialogue in Co-Operation with the World Council of Churches.
Günter Frank (2010). Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560) : Reformer and Philosopher. In Paul Richard Blum (ed.), Philosophers of the Renaissance. Catholic University of America Press.
Neal Judisch (2008). Theological Determinism and the Problem of Evil. Religious Studies 44 (2):165-184.
Jennifer Erin Beste (2007). God and the Victim: Traumatic Intrusions on Grace and Freedom. Oxford University Press.
John E. Hare (2000). Kant on Recognizing Our Duties As God's Commands. Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):459-478.
Roger H. Crook (2006). An Introduction to Christian Ethics. Pearson Education.
Louis Roy (2012). Does Christian Faith Rule Out Human Autonomy? Heythrop Journal 53 (4):606-623.
Jonathan D. Jacobs (2009). An Eastern Orthodox Conception of Theosis and Human Nature. Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):615-627.
Malcolm A. Jeeves (1997/2006). Human Nature: Reflections on the Integration of Psychology and Christianity. Templeton Foundation Press.
Gregory R. Peterson (2008). Uniqueness, the Image of God, and the Problem of Method: Engaging Van Huyssteen. Zygon 43 (2):467-474.
Thomas P. Flint (2001). A Death He Freely Accepted. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):3-20.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-09-09Total downloads12 ( #94,595 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
