Direct Realism: A Study Of Perception
Boston: Nijhoff (1983)
| Abstract | a vigorous and challenging defence of direct realism in which one gets not only a clear overview of what precisely the problems are, but also a forceful and ... | |||||||||
| Keywords | Appearance Direct Realism Epistemology Metaphysics Perception Phenomenalism Time-lag Argument | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $161.65 new (19% off) $209.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | B835.G7 1983 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 9024728703 9789024728701 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Laurence BonJour (2004). In Search of Direct Realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):349-367.
J. J. C. Smart (2002). The Compatibility of Direct Realism with the Scientific Account of Perception; Comment on Mark Crooks. Journal of Mind and Behavior 23 (3):239-244.
James W. Cornman (1972). On Direct Perception. Review of Metaphysics 26 (September):38-56.
Dan D. Crawford (1982). Are There Mental Inferences in Direct Perceptions? American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (January):83-92.
Robert G. Hudson (2000). Perceiving Empirical Objects Directly. Erkenntnis 52 (3):357-371.
Douglas J. McDermid (2001). What is Direct Perceptual Knowledge? A Fivefold Confusion. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):1-16.
N. M. L. Nathan (2005). Direct Realism: Proximate Causation and the Missing Object. Acta Analytica 20 (36):3-6.
Michael Huemer (2001). Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
Pierre le Morvan (2004). Arguments Against Direct Realism and How to Counter Them. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):221-234.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads110 ( #5,043 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,270 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |

