Domesticating the Magnet: Secularity, Secrecy and 'Permanency' as Epistemic Boundaries in Marie Curie's Early Work
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):68-81 (2010)
This paper investigates the magnet as a classic “boundary object” of modern technoscientific culture. Equally at home in the nursery, dynamo, measuring instrument and navigational compass, its capricious performance nevertheless persistently eluded the powers of nineteenth century electromagnetic expertise in pursuit of the completely “permanent” magnet. Instead the untamed magnet’s resilient secularity required its makers to draw upon ancient techniques of chemical manipulation, heat treatment and maturation to render it eventually sufficiently stable in behaviour for orderly use in modern engineering. The precise methods for accomplishing this quasi-permanence were typically protected by trade secrecy – until that is Marie Sklodowska Curie’s first research publication opened up this topic for rigorous comparative research in 1898. Nevertheless, over the next quarter century her work in this field was gradually eclipsed by heavily gendered citation practices, just as the futility of attempting to accomplish complete permanency in magnets was eventually established by Sydney Evershed in the 1920s
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Arlene S. Kanter, Permanency Planning for Children with Disabilities: Enforcing the Right of All Children to Live with a Family.
John Earman (2004). Curie's Principle and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):173 – 198.
Michael Puett (2010). Theodicies of Discontinuity: Domesticating Energies and Dispositions in Early China. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (s1):51-66.
Diana Preston (2005). Before the Fall-Out: The Human Chain Reaction From Marie Curie to Hiroshima. Doubleday.
William De Maria (2006). Brother Secret, Sister Silence: Sibling Conspiracies Against Managerial Integrity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):219-234.
Gregory R. Peterson (2010). Stage-Two Secularity and the Future of Theology-and-Science. Zygon 45 (2):506-516.
William De Maria (2006). Brother Secret, Sister Silence: Sibling Conspiracies Against Managerial Integrity. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):219 - 234.
David B. Resnik (2005). Openness Versus Secrecy in Scientific Research. Episteme 2 (3):135-147.
Scott F. Aikin (2009). Prospects for Peircian Epistemic Infinitism. Contemporary Pragmatism 6 (2):71-89.
Patricia Curd (2011). New Work on the Presocratics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):1-37.
Victor Pompa (1992). Managerial Secrecy: An Ethical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):147 - 156.
Jenann Ismael (1997). Curie's Principle. Synthese 110 (2):167-190.
Henry Jackman (2004). Temporal Externalism and Epistemic Theories of Vagueness. Philosophical Studies 117 (1-2):79-94.
Augustine Shutte (2010). Evolution and Emergence. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):235-264.
Immanuel Kant (1998). Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads7 ( #440,511 of 1,911,593 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #321,691 of 1,911,593 )
How can I increase my downloads?