|Abstract||Despite the success of General Relativity in depicting gravity, inertia--an equivalent force--continues to defy explanation. Even its status as a force is open to question since its source has never been determined. Starting from the assumption that gravity and inertia are truly equal forces, a train of syllogistic reasoning shows that gravity, centrifugal force, and inertia all have the same nature. The interrelationship of these forces within a rotating frame of reference demonstrates their oneness, and establishes inertia as the reacting force in Newton's Third Law. The same source is deduced for both gravity and inertia in a simple and novel way without reference to relativistic space-time or Mach's Principle. This essay is directed at the interested layman, but the issues it grapples with belong to everyone.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Janiak (2007). Newton and the Reality of Force. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):127-147.
Julian B. Barbour & Bruno Bertotti (1977). Gravity and Inertia in a Machian Framework. Nuovo Cimento 38:1--27.
Carolina Sartorio (2008). Moral Inertia. Philosophical Studies 140 (1):117 - 133.
Chuang Liu (2003). Gauge Gravity and the Unification of Natural Forces. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):143 – 159.
Beryl E. Clotfelter (1970). Reference Systems and Inertia. Ames,Iowa State University Press.
J. Earman & M. Friedman (1973). The Meaning and Status of Newton's Law of Inertia and the Nature of Gravitational Forces. Philosophy of Science 40 (3):329-359.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #57,056 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?