Inquiry 23 (2):233 – 242 (1980)
|Abstract||In a recent Inquiry article Louis Pascal argues that the problem of massive starvation in the modern world is the result of a genetically-based human propensity to produce as many offspring as possible, regardless of ecological conditions. In this paper biological and anthropological objections to Pascal's thesis are discussed as well as the conclusions he draws from it. It is suggested that natural selection has produced humans who are flexible in their reproductive behavior in order to cope with rapidly changing environments. The implications of both arguments for the population movement and the attempt to eliminate starvation are discussed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas A. C. Reydon (2009). Gene Names as Proper Names of Individuals: An Assessment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):409-432.
Sylvia Culp (1997). Establishing Genotype/Phenotype Relationships: Gene Targeting as an Experimental Approach. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):278.
Jenny Shaw (1977). In Loco Parent Is:A Relationship Between Parent, State and Child. Journal of Moral Education 6 (3):181-190.
Mary Midgley (1983). Selfish Genes and Social Darwinism. Philosophy 58 (225):365-.
James Miles (1998). Unnatural Selection. Philosophy 73 (4):593-608.
W. J. Ewens (2011). What is the Gene Trying to Do? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):155-176.
Louis Pascal (1980). Ii. Rejoinder to Gray and Wolfe. Inquiry 23 (2):242 – 251.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads13 ( #88,037 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?