David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271 (2010)
In this essay, I argue that a proper understanding of the historicity of love requires an appreciation of the irreplaceability of the beloved. I do this through a consideration of ideas that were first put forward by Robert Kraut in “Love De Re” (1986). I also evaluate Amelie Rorty's criticisms of Kraut's thesis in “The Historicity of Psychological Attitudes: Love is Not Love Which Alters Not When It Alteration Finds” (1986). I argue that Rorty fundamentally misunderstands Kraut's Kripkean analogy, and I go on to criticize her claim that concern over the proper object of love should be best understood as a concern over constancy. This leads me to an elaboration of the distinct senses in which love can be seen as historical. I end with a further defense of the irreplaceability of the beloved and a discussion of the relevance of recent debates over the importance of personal identity for an adequate account of the historical dimension of love
|Keywords||love history causal theory personal identity irreplaceability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mark Bernstein (1985). Love, Particularity, and Selfhood. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):287-293.
David Cockburn (1990). Other Human Beings. St. Martin's Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1999). Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge University Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (2006). Taking Ourselves Seriously & Getting It Right. Stanford University Press.
Christopher W. Gowans (1996). Intimacy, Freedom, and Unique Value: A "Kantian" Account of the Irreplaceable and Incomparable Value of Persons. American Philosophical Quarterly 33 (1):75 - 89.
Citations of this work BETA
Timothy Chappell (2011). On the Very Idea of Criteria for Personhood. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):1-27.
Christopher Grau & Cynthia Pury (2014). Attitudes Towards Reference and Replaceability. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (2):155-168.
Tony Milligan (2013). The Duplication of Love's Reasons. Philosophical Explorations 16 (3):315 - 323.
Nina Brewer-Davis (2013). Loving Relationships and Conflicts with Morality. Dialogue 52 (2):359-375.
Similar books and articles
Lubomir Lamy (2011). Love or the Black Sun of Personal Relationships. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (3):247-259.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Alan Soble (2000). The Coherence of Love. Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):293-315.
Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (1987). The Historicity of Psychological Attitudes: Love Is Not Love Which Alters Not When It Alteration Finds. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):399-412.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Pierre Rousselot (2001). The Problem of Love in the Middle Ages: A Historical Contribution. Marquette University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2010-05-05
Total downloads124 ( #7,165 of 1,098,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #27,099 of 1,098,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?