Mill's liberalism and liberalism's posterity
Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):137-165 (2000)
| Abstract | It is argued that the moral theory undergirding J.S. Mill''s argumentin On Liberty is a species of perfectionism rather than any kind of utilitarianism. The conception of human flourishing that itinvokes is one in which the goods of personal autonomy and individualityare central. If this conception is to be more than the expression ofa particular cultural ideal it needs the support of an empiricallyplausible view of human nature and a defensible interpretation ofhistory. Neither of these can be found in Mill. Six traditionalcriticisms of Mill''s argument are assessed. It is concluded thatin addition to depending on implausible claims about human natureand history Mill''s conception of the good contains disablingincommensurabilities. It is argued that these difficulties andincommensurabilities plague later liberal thinkers such as IsaiahBerlin and Joseph Raz who have sought to ground liberalism in avalue-pluralist ethical theory. No thinker in Mill''s liberal posterity has been able to demonstrate the universal authority of liberal ideals. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras (eds.) (2007). J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
Mariana Szapuova (2006). Mill's Liberal Feminism: Its Legacy and Current Criticism. Prolegomena 5 (2):179-191.
Sean Johnston (2010). Conceptions of the Good and the Ubiquity of Power. Social Philosophy Today 26:83-90.
Alan E. Fuchs (2001). Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Maurice Cowling (1990). Mill and Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
John Skorupski (2006). Why Read Mill Today. Routledge.
Arnolds Kaufman (1971). Wants, Needs, and Liberalism. Inquiry 14 (1-4):191 – 206.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads27 ( #45,755 of 549,044 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,044 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
