David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):137-165 (2000)
It is argued that the moral theory undergirding J.S. Mill''s argumentin On Liberty is a species of perfectionism rather than any kind of utilitarianism. The conception of human flourishing that itinvokes is one in which the goods of personal autonomy and individualityare central. If this conception is to be more than the expression ofa particular cultural ideal it needs the support of an empiricallyplausible view of human nature and a defensible interpretation ofhistory. Neither of these can be found in Mill. Six traditionalcriticisms of Mill''s argument are assessed. It is concluded thatin addition to depending on implausible claims about human natureand history Mill''s conception of the good contains disablingincommensurabilities. It is argued that these difficulties andincommensurabilities plague later liberal thinkers such as IsaiahBerlin and Joseph Raz who have sought to ground liberalism in avalue-pluralist ethical theory. No thinker in Mill''s liberal posterity has been able to demonstrate the universal authority of liberal ideals.
|Keywords||Enlightenment liberalism perfectionism progress utilitarianism value-pluralism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras (eds.) (2007). J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
D. G. Brown (2012). Mill's Justice and Political Liberalism. In Leonard Kahn (ed.), Mill on Justice. Palgrave Macmillan 135.
John Skorupski (2006). Why Read Mill Today. Routledge.
Maurice Cowling (1990). Mill and Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
Alan E. Fuchs (2001). Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Sean Johnston (2010). Conceptions of the Good and the Ubiquity of Power. Social Philosophy Today 26:83-90.
Mariana Szapuova (2006). Mill's Liberal Feminism: Its Legacy and Current Criticism. Prolegomena 5 (2):179-191.
Arnolds Kaufman (1971). Wants, Needs, and Liberalism. Inquiry 14 (1-4):191 – 206.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #71,190 of 1,724,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,193 of 1,724,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?