Philosophy of science and the revival of classical ontology: A reply
Journal of Philosophy 54 (5):131-137 (1957)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKanti Lal Das & Anirban Mukherjee (eds.) (2008). Language and Ontology. Northern Book Centre.
Stéphanie Ruphy (2006). Ontology Relativized: Reply to Moulines. Synthese 151 (3):325 - 330.
Eli Hirsch (2010). Quantifier Variance and Realism: Essays in Metaontology. Oxford University Press.
Frederick Sontag (1958). Ontology and the Philosophy of Science: A Reply. Journal of Philosophy 55 (8):337-339.
Alexandre Koyré (1947). The Revival of "the Liar": Reply. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (2):254-255.
Edwin B. Allaire (1965). Ontology and Acquaintance: A Reply to Clatterbaugh. Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):277-280.
Frederick Sontag (1956). Philosophy of Science and the Revival of Classical Ontology. Journal of Philosophy 53 (20):597-607.
Jiyuan Yu (2008). The “Manifesto” of New-Confucianism and the Revival of Virtue Ethics. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):317-334.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,507 of 548,972 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
