Quis Erus Est?

The Classical Review 23 (02):123- (1973)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Jaakko Hintikka (1996). Cogito, Ergo Quis Est? Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50 (195):5-21.
    R. H. Martin (1968). Quibus and Quis in Tacitus. The Classical Review 18 (02):144-146.
    Edwin W. Fay (1898). Quis For Aliquis. The Classical Review 12 (06):296-299.
    John Laird (1920/1971). A Study in Realism. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
    Solange Mercier-Josa (1984). Est-Ce “ l'Esprit ”, Est-Ce “ le Capital ” ? Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 89 (3):348 - 360.
    Joseph Owens (1980). Philosophy—An Est and Quid Est. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 54:37-48.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

    Added to index

    2010-12-09

    Total downloads

    1 ( #306,128 of 1,088,389 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    0

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.