Quis Erus Est?

The Classical Review 23 (02):123- (1973)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009840X00240092
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jaakko Hintikka (1996). Cogito, Ergo Quis Est? Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50 (195):5-21.
R. H. Martin (1968). Quibus and Quis in Tacitus. The Classical Review 18 (02):144-146.
Edwin W. Fay (1898). Quis For Aliquis. The Classical Review 12 (06):296-299.
John Laird (1920/1971). A Study in Realism. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Solange Mercier-Josa (1984). Est-ce “ l'Esprit ”, est-ce “ le Capital ” ? Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 89 (3):348 - 360.
Joseph Owens (1980). Philosophy—An Est and Quid Est. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 54:37-48.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

3 ( #462,758 of 1,725,840 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,700 of 1,725,840 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.