Topoi 11 (2):121-133 (1992)
|Abstract||This article discusses Suárez''s views concerning the transcendentals, that is, being and those attributes of it that extend to everything. In particular it explores Suárez''s notion of transcendentality and the way in which he conceived the transcendental attributes of being are related to it. It makes two claims: First, that Suárez has an intensional, rather than an extensional understanding of transcendentality; and, second, that Suárez''s understanding of truth and goodness, as expressing real extrinsic denominations based on real relations, appears to contain an inconsistency.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Erik Åkerlund (2009). Suárez on Forms, Universals and Understanding. Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (2):159-182.
Scott MacDonald (1992). Goodness as Transcendental: The Early Thirteenth-Century Recovery of an Aristotelian Idea. Topoi 11 (2):173-186.
Marleen Rozemond (2012). Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez's Soul. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oup Oxford.
Daniel Heider (2007). Is Suárez's Concept of Being Analogical or Univocal? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):21-41.
Daniel Schwartz (2008). Francisco Suárez on Consent and Political Obligation. Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (1992). The Transcendentals in the Middle Ages: An Introduction. Topoi 11 (2):113-120.
Daniel Schwartz (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (1991). Francisco Suárez. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65 (3):259-266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #39,312 of 549,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,186 of 549,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?