Sentential Logic for Psychologists

Abstract Students often study logic on the assumption that it provides a normative guide to reasoning in English. In particular, they are taught to associate connectives like “and” with counterparts in Sentential Logic. English conditionals go over to formulas with → as principal connective. The well-known difficulties that arise from such translation are not emphasized. The result is the conviction that ordinary reasoning is faulty when discordant with the usual representation in standard logic. Psychologists are particularly susceptible to this attitude.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,672
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries

    Similar books and articles
    Kevin C. Klement, Propositional Logic. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    G. Aldo Antonelli (2004). Logic. In Luciano Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Blackwell.
    Berislav Žarnić (2011). Prelude to a Socio-Logic of Imperatives. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):6-16.
    Pascal Engel (2006). Logic, Reasoning and the Logical Constants. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):219-235.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-12-22

    Total downloads

    5 ( #160,284 of 549,064 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,185 of 549,064 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums