|Abstract||If you’ve read the first five hundred pages of this book, you’ve read most of it (we assume that ‘most’ requires more than ‘more than half’). The set of natural numbers n such that the first n pages are most of this book is nonempty. Therefore, by the least number principle, it has a least member k. What is k? We do not know. We have no idea how to find out. The obstacle is something about the term ‘most’. It is recognisably the same feature as the feature of ‘heap’ that prevents us from finding an answer to the question ‘How many grains make a heap?’ and the feature of many other expressions that prevents us from finding answers to similar questions involving them. Call this feature, whatever its underlying nature, vagueness.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Rowan Cruft (2006). Why Aren't Duties Rights? Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):175-192.
By Rowan Cruft (2006). Why Aren't Duties Rights? Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):175–192.
Robert M. French & Mark Weaver (1998). New-Feature Learning: How Common is It? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):26-26.
Scott A. Huettel & Gregory R. Lockhead (1998). A Framework for Structural Constraints on Feature Creation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):29-29.
Jussi Haukioja (2006). Proto-Rigidity. Synthese 150 (2):155 - 169.
Dale J. Cohen & Michael Kubovy (1999). Even Feature Integration is Cognitively Impenetrable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):371-372.
Philip J. Benson (1998). Feature See, Feature Do. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):18-19.
Timothy Williamson (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Added to index2009-08-08
Total downloads36 ( #32,922 of 548,970 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?