The normative failure of Fuller's social epistemology

Social Epistemology 16 (2):133 – 148 (2001)
One of the major themes of Steve Fuller's project of social epistemology is a reconciliation of the normative concerns of epistemologists with the empirical concerns of sociologists of knowledge. Fuller views social epistemologists as knowledge policy makers, who will provide direction for improvements in the cognitive division of labour. However, this paper argues that Fuller's conception of knowledge production and his approval of a panglossian approach to epistemology fail to provide the normative force he claims, and leave us unable to identify anything epistemic about our knowledge-seeking practices.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720210150770
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Steve Fuller (2001). Not the Best of All Possible Critiques. Social Epistemology 16 (2):149 – 155.
Heidi Grasswick (2002). Leaving Dr Pangloss Behind. Social Epistemology 16 (4):377 – 382.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

18 ( #153,716 of 1,726,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,858 of 1,726,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.