David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):275-289 (2012)
The aim of this paper is to explain why imaginativeness is valuable. Recent discussions of imaginativeness or creativity (which I regard as the same property) have paid relatively little attention to this important question. My discussion has three parts. First, I elucidate the concept of imaginativeness by providing three conditions a product or act must satisfy in order to be imaginative. This account enables us to explain, among other things, why imaginativeness is associated with inspiration, why it is associated with the faculty of imagination, and why it is relative to persons and to contexts. Second, in the light of this account, I say what the imaginativeness of persons is. Philosophical discussions of the imaginativeness of persons usually treat it as a capacity. In fact, it is a tendency or disposition of a certain kind. Third, I give reasons why the imaginativeness of persons has the value it does. I begin by saying what the basic facts about its value are. When a person's imaginativeness is valuable, it is either (i) a good thing about a person, (ii) good for the person, or (iii) good for others. I provide explanations of each of these facts. I conclude by addressing the difficult question of whether a person's imaginativeness is non-instrumentally good for her. On Romantic and Romantic-inspired views, imaginativeness is non-instrumentally good for a person because of its connection with self-realization. I reject this claim. However, I argue that, often, imaginativeness is indeed non-instrumentally good for the imaginative person
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Isaiah Berlin (2002). Liberty. OUP Oxford.
Berys Gaut (2010). The Philosophy of Creativity. Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1034-1046.
Berys Nigel Gaut & Paisley Livingston (eds.) (2003). The Creation of Art: New Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
David Novitz (1999). Creativity and Constraint. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):67 – 82.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Abelard (2001). Peter Abelard: Collationes. Clarendon Press.
Alexander Sarch (2011). Internalism About a Person's Good: Don't Believe It. Philosophical Studies 154 (02):161 - 184.
Richard Arneson (1999). Human Flourishing Versus Desire Satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (01):113-142.
Linda Zagzebski (2001). The Uniqueness of Persons. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):401 - 423.
Christian Smith (2010). What is a Person?: Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good From the Person Up. The University of Chicago Press.
Guido Melchior (2011). Privileges of First-Person Reference and of Third-Person Reference. Acta Analytica 26 (1):37-52.
Connie S. Rosati (1996). Internalism and the Good for a Person. Ethics 106 (2):297-326.
Rita C. Manning (1984). Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
Stephen Darwall (1998). Empathy, Sympathy, Care. Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):261–282.
John Barresi (1999). On Becoming a Person. Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):79-98.
Zac Cogley (2012). Trust and the Trickster Problem. Analytic Philosophy 53 (1):30-47.
David Sobel (2010). The Limits of the Explanatory Power of Developmentalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):517-527.
Francesco Orsi (2013). What's Wrong with Moorean Buck-Passing? Philosophical Studies 164 (3):727-746.
Added to index2011-07-12
Total downloads43 ( #73,495 of 1,707,799 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #352,886 of 1,707,799 )
How can I increase my downloads?