Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):163–183 (2001)
|Abstract||In contrast to symbolic or associationist representations, I advocate a third form of representing information that employs geometrical structures. I argue that this form is appropriate for modelling concept learning. By using the geometrical structures of what I call conceptual spaces, I define properties and concepts. A learning model that shows how properties and concepts can be learned in a simple but naturalistic way is then presented. I also discuss the advantages of the geometric approach over the symbolic and associationist traditions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chris Thornton (1997). Brave Mobots Use Representation: Emergence of Representation in Fight-or-Flight Learning. Minds and Machines 7 (4):475-494.
Alex McLean (2010). Unifying Conceptual Spaces: Concept Formation in Musical Creative Systems. Minds and Machines 20 (4):503-532.
Eric Margolis (1998). How to Acquire a Concept. Mind and Language 13 (3):347-369.
Peter Gardenfors (2004). Conceptual Spaces as a Framework for Knowledge Representation. Mind and Matter 2 (2):9-27.
Anne Newstead & Franklin James, The Epistemology of Geometry I: The Problem of Exactness. ASCS 2009 Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Society for Cognitive Science Conference.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (2011). Learning Matters: The Role of Learning in Concept Acquisition. Mind and Language 26 (5):507-539.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2008). The Origins of Concepts. Philosophical Studies 140 (3):359 - 384.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #45,693 of 548,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?