|Abstract||This theoretical integration of social psychology’s main cognitive and affective constructs was shaped by 3 influences: (a) recent widespread interest in automatic and implicit cognition, (b) development of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, & J. L. K. Schwartz, 1998), and (c) social psychology’s consistency theories of the 1950s, especially F. Heider’s (1958) balance theory. The balanced identity design is introduced as a method to test correlational predictions of the theory. Data obtained with this method revealed that predicted consistency patterns were strongly apparent in the data for implicit (IAT) measures but not in those for parallel explicit (self-report) measures. Two additional not-yet-tested predictions of the theory are described.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Eric Luis Uhlmann, Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity.
Niels A. Taatgen (1999). Implicit Versus Explicit: An ACT-R Learning Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):785-786.
Anthony Greenwald, The Implicit Association Test's D Measure Can Minimize a Cognitive Skill Confound: Comment on McFarland and Crouch (2002).
Ron Sun, Incubation, Insight, and Creative Problem Solving: A Unified Theory and a Connectionist Model.
Brian C. Tietje, Is the Implicit Association Test a Valid and Valuable Measure of Implicit Consumer Social Cognition?
D. Maison, Anthony G. Greenwald & R. H. Bruin (2004). Predictive Validity of the Implicit Association Test in Studies of Brands, Consumer Attitudes, and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14:405-415.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #44,181 of 551,054 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,054 )
How can I increase my downloads?